Dilapidations are the breaches of a tenant's obligations under a commercial lease to keep the property in repair, to maintain its decorative condition and to reinstate any alterations made during the term. For commercial tenants in London, dilapidations claims can represent a significant financial exposure at the end of a lease, and understanding your position early is essential to managing cost and risk.
Most commercial leases in London contain repairing covenants that oblige the tenant to keep the property in a defined standard of repair throughout the term and to hand it back in that condition at lease expiry. The precise scope of the obligation depends on the wording of the lease, but common obligations include repair, decoration, reinstatement of alterations, compliance with statute and yielding up in good and tenantable repair.
At or towards the end of the lease term, the landlord will typically instruct a building surveyor to prepare a schedule of dilapidations — a formal document listing all the alleged breaches and their estimated cost. This schedule is then served on the tenant, who is expected to respond either by carrying out the works or negotiating a financial settlement.
Terminal dilapidations are the most common type. The schedule is served at or near the end of the lease term and covers all outstanding breaches. This is the point at which the full extent of the tenant's liability crystallises, and it is where the largest claims typically arise.
Interim dilapidations (or interim schedules) can be served during the lease term where the tenant is in breach of their repairing obligations. The landlord can serve a notice requiring the tenant to carry out specific repairs within a reasonable timeframe. Interim claims are less common but can be used where the property is deteriorating significantly during the term.
Final dilapidations are served after the lease has expired and the tenant has vacated. The schedule is based on the condition of the property at the point of handover. This is the most common scenario for London commercial properties, particularly in Westminster and the City of London where office lease cycles are well established.
Many London commercial leases are granted on a full repairing and insuring basis. Under an FRI lease, the tenant is responsible for all repairs to the property, including the structure, exterior, interior, services and common parts (or contributes to common parts via a service charge). The tenant's obligation is to keep the property in the same condition as at the start of the lease, or in some cases to a higher standard.
Some leases, particularly for units within larger buildings, limit the tenant's repairing obligation to the interior of the demised premises only. The landlord retains responsibility for the structure, exterior and common parts, recovering costs through the service charge. Even under an IRI lease, the tenant may still face significant dilapidations exposure for decoration, reinstatement and internal repairs.
If a schedule of condition was prepared at the start of the lease and appended to or referenced in the lease, the tenant's obligation may be limited to returning the property in no worse condition than recorded at lease commencement. A well-prepared schedule of condition is one of the most effective tools for limiting dilapidations exposure, as it provides a clear, dated record of the property's baseline condition.
Most leases require the tenant to remove any alterations made during the term and reinstate the property to its original layout and specification. This can be one of the most expensive items in a dilapidations claim, particularly where the tenant has carried out significant fit-out works. However, reinstatement obligations are not absolute — the landlord may waive reinstatement if the alterations add value or suit their plans for the property.
When you receive a schedule of dilapidations, the first step is to instruct your own chartered building surveyor to review the claim. Your surveyor will assess each item in the schedule against the actual condition of the property, the lease terms and the available evidence. Items may be accepted, challenged or partially contested depending on the merits.
Common grounds for challenging items include: the item was in the same condition at lease commencement (evidenced by a schedule of condition), the item falls outside the tenant's demise or repairing obligation, the claimed scope of work is excessive, the costed rates are above market level, or the item has reached the end of its natural life and replacement would constitute improvement rather than repair.
In London commercial properties, common dilapidations items include worn or damaged floor coverings, redecoration of walls and ceilings, replacement of ceiling tiles, repair or replacement of sanitary fittings, HVAC servicing and repair, reinstatement of partitions and fit-out, external repairs to facades and windows, and removal of tenant signage and branding. The total claim value can range from £10 to £80 per square foot or more, depending on the property type, condition and scope of the landlord's requirements.
Most dilapidations matters are resolved through negotiation rather than litigation. Your surveyor will prepare a response to the schedule, setting out your position on each item. Effective negotiation strategies include commissioning your own cost estimate for the items you accept, demonstrating that the landlord's costs are inflated, evidencing the baseline condition using any available records, and deploying the diminution in value defence where the landlord intends to redevelop, refurbish or has already re-let the property.
The RICS Dilapidations Guidance Note (7th Edition) provides the framework within which most dilapidations negotiations are conducted. Your surveyor should be thoroughly familiar with this guidance and its practical application.
Section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 is a critical statutory protection for tenants. It caps the landlord's damages at the amount by which the value of their interest is diminished by the tenant's breaches. If the landlord intends to demolish the building, carry out substantial works that would render the tenant's repairs pointless, or has already re-let the property at a rent unaffected by the disrepair, the tenant's liability may be significantly reduced or even extinguished entirely. This defence requires expert valuation evidence and should be considered in any case where there are indications that the landlord does not intend to carry out the claimed works.
A schedule of dilapidations is a formal document prepared by the landlord's surveyor that lists all the alleged breaches of the tenant's repairing, decorating and reinstatement obligations under the lease. It itemises each defect, references the relevant lease clause, describes the required remedy and provides an estimated cost. The schedule is served on the tenant and forms the basis for negotiation or, if necessary, court proceedings. The RICS Dilapidations Guidance Note sets out the standards expected for preparation and service of a schedule.
Yes. Tenants have several legitimate grounds on which to challenge items in a dilapidations schedule. These include demonstrating that an item was in the same condition at lease commencement (if a schedule of condition exists), that the item falls outside the tenant's repairing obligation under the lease, that the claimed cost is excessive or above market rate, that the work would constitute improvement rather than repair, or that the landlord's loss is limited by the statutory cap under Section 18(1). Professional surveying advice is essential to identify and deploy these defences effectively.
The diminution in value defence, derived from Section 18(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927, limits the landlord's dilapidations damages to the amount by which the value of their reversion is reduced by the tenant's breaches. If the landlord plans to demolish or substantially redevelop the building, the tenant's repairs would be rendered worthless, and the damages cap may reduce the claim to nil. This defence requires valuation evidence and is most commonly deployed where there is evidence of the landlord's future intentions for the property.
Ideally, you should seek professional advice at least 12 to 18 months before your lease expiry. This allows time to understand the full scope of your obligations, carry out any cost-effective repairs before the landlord's surveyor inspects, prepare your position on reinstatement, and develop a negotiation strategy. Early advice typically reduces the final settlement cost significantly. If you receive a schedule unexpectedly, instruct a surveyor immediately — prompt action is critical to protecting your position.
Expert dilapidations advice for landlords and tenants, including schedule preparation, response and negotiation.
View ServiceDetailed condition assessments and schedules of condition to establish baseline property condition.
View ServiceIf you need advice on a dilapidations matter, lease obligation or schedule response, we can help.
Contact Us